RSP: Critical Literature Review

07.11.2006

[Mike Grenfell]

Writing a critical literature review

  1. Where does my research fit in?
  2. What is available to me in terms of documents?
  3. What should be the process in producing a CLR?
  4. What characterizes a CLR?
  5. What is meant by critical?
  6. What do I know already?
  7. What do I have to do?

How does your research topic fit in?

(Background)

  •  History
  • What is known about it?
  • What are the significant findings?
  • What is not known?
  • What kind of approaches are dominant in your  field?
  • What are the confilcts and tensions?
  • Your contributions?

What is availabole to me in terms of documents?

(What you can quote in a research)

  • Research journals
  • Books
  • Oficial documents
  • Conference proceedings
  • White paper
  • Online articles
  • Personal communications
  • Magazines, newspapers
  • Mimeograph

What should be the process in producing a CLR?Divide the area of the review into sections

  • Always explain the structure of the chapter or section
  • REview periodically
  • Tell them what you are going to tell them, tell them, and tell them what you have told them (true for chapters/sections)
  • Work to a word legth
  • Don’t just describe – copmment with your views
  • Thesis + antithesis ->  synthesis
  • Syntethize: narrative structure + meta narrative
  • Be careful with “I”, “should”, “this”
  • Use 1.1.; 1.2.; 1.3. and so on, but not overdo it
  • Use citations with effects
  • Be prepared to up-date

What characterizes a CLR?

  • A literature review is a kind of this is my way to tell the story
  • You can seek some guidelines, but you need to do it in your own way.
  • It’s you developing your version of it.
  • Enough reference but not too much reference. Don’t do oblique reference.
  • The tone of a critical review tend to be passive, rather than in the first person.
  • Analyse a critical review:

                     layout

language [sense of audience]

style

What do I have do?

  • Read for a purpose
  • Read for two weeks andwrite, read two weeks and write, create a cycle
  • Situate your field/topic
  • Work from a concept map
  • Make notes of everything you read
  • Discrimminate between the centrality and the marginality of what you read
  • Adopt reading strategies
  • Look for previous reviews
  • Cover a range of old and new (background)
  • Do a literature research